Friday, 6 May 2011

thesis


Chapter 4
 Interpretation and Findings

This chapter presents the findings of the research work. A summary of the demographic data is then displayed follow by the listing of descriptive statistics for each variable. The population was different general customers from college, university, public place and telecom customer service center. A sample of 250 was selected and the data received from the participants were analyzed from summaries of the demographic information, for descriptive statistics.

Descriptive Analysis
Description analysis is used to show collected data in a better way and to understand the finding clear. We have conducting a survey on “the impact of customer relationship management on customer satisfaction in telecom sector in Pakistan” and for the survey we suggest a sample size of 250 customers and the survey is based on the questionnaire which will be filled and for the result we will work on descriptive analysis.







FREQUENCY STATISTICS


Statistics
Age:
N
Valid
250
Missing
0



Age


Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
15 to 20
35
14.0
14.0
14.0
21 to 30
174
69.6
69.6
83.6
31 to 40
41
16.4
16.4
100.0
Total
250
100.0
100.0



In the questionnaire filled by different participant for this study, and replied to the questions, 14% was between 15 to 20 young which where form school and colleges. 69.6% of age 21 to 30 years, and 16.4% from 31 to 40 years which help me in this study.








Statistics
Gender
N
Valid
250
Missing
0



Gender


Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
male
214
85.6
85.6
85.6
female
36
14.4
14.4
100.0
Total
250
100.0
100.0



The questionnaire was filled on general public which are customer of the telecom. In the survey the participant 85.6% male and 14.4% female help in this survey to understand the customer satisfaction better.










Statistics
Education
N
Valid
250
Missing
0



Education


Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
inter
71
28.4
28.4
28.4
graduates
104
41.6
41.6
70.0
master
75
30.0
30.0
100.0
Total
250
100.0
100.0



This questionnaire was filled from different area of Lahore city. In the survey they are 250 participant replied regarding this question. 28.4% participant are inter student. 41.6% participant are graduates and 30% participant are masters.














Statistics
Occupation
N
Valid
250
Missing
0






Occupation


Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
public employment
20
8.0
8.0
8.0
private employment
79
31.6
31.6
39.6
self employment
18
7.2
7.2
46.8
student
133
53.2
53.2
100.0
Total
250
100.0
100.0





This questionnaire was filled from different area of Lahore city. In the survey they are 250 participant replied regarding this question. 8% are public employee, 31.6% are private employee, 7.2 % are self employee and 53.2% are student which are the participant for the survey  














Statistics
User
N
Valid
250
Missing
0




User


Frequency
Percent
Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid
ufone
76
30.4
30.4
30.4
telenor
54
21.6
21.6
52.0
warid
41
16.4
16.4
68.4
zong
48
19.2
19.2
87.6
mobilink
31
12.4
12.4
100.0
Total
250
100.0
100.0



This questionnaire was filled from different area of Lahore city. In the survey they are 250 participant replied regarding this question to find out the customer of the telecom in Pakistan. 30.4 % are ufone user, 21.6% are telenor user, 16.4 % are warid user, 19.2% are zong user and 12.4% are mobilink user.





Descriptive Statistics:
Now we will use the description statistics of our survey and we are interpreting the outcomes of the questionnaire on sample size of 250 participants, our question’s statistics and their interpretation are as follow,

Customer satisfaction
Descriptive Statistics

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Customer satisfaction
250
1
5
2.19
.871
Valid N (listwise)
250





According to the outcome of the description statistics regarding customer satisfaction, the number of the participant in the survey 250, in which the minimum is 1 and the maximum is 5, as the mean value is 2.19 which show our average is near to favorable reply. And the std, derivation is .871 which show that the most of participant in the range between very satisfied and in the area of normal.  

Network
Descriptive Statistics

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
are you satisfied with the network you use?
250
1
3
2.16
.641
Valid N (listwise)
250





According to the outcome of the description statistics regarding customer satisfaction, the number of the participant in the survey 250, in which the minimum is 1 and the maximum is, as the mean value is 2.16 which show our average is near to favorable reply. And the std, derivation is .641 which show that the most of participant in the range between very satisfied and in the area of normal.  
Quality

Descriptive Statistics

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Quality
250
1
4
2.14
.647
Valid N (listwise)
250





According to the outcome of the description statistics regarding customer satisfaction, the number of the participant in the survey 250, in which the minimum is 1 and the maximum is 4, as the mean value is 2.14 which show our average is near to favorable reply. And the std, derivation is .647 which show that the most of participant in the range between very satisfied and in the area of normal
Service center


Descriptive Statistics

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
service quality
250
1
4
2.01
.931
Valid N (listwise)
250






According to the outcome of the description statistics regarding customer satisfaction, the number of the participant in the survey 250, in which the minimum is 1 and the maximum is 4, as the mean value is 2.01 which show our average is near to favorable reply. And the std, derivation is .931 which show that the most of participant in the range between very satisfied and in the area of normal





Internal satisfaction

Descriptive Statistics

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
Internal satisfaction
250
1
5
2.19
.871
Valid N (listwise)
250





.
According to the outcome of the description statistics regarding customer satisfaction, the number of the participant in the survey 250, in which the minimum is 1 and the maximum is 5, as the mean value is 2.19 which show our average is near to favorable reply. And the std, derivation is .871 which show that the most of participant in the range between very satisfied and in the area of normal

Customer loyalty:

Descriptive Statistics

N
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
I will encourage  my friend and family to use this service
250
1
4
2.11
1.000
Valid N (listwise)
250





According to the outcome of the description statistics regarding customer satisfaction, the number of the participant in the survey 250, in which the minimum is 1 and the maximum is 4, as the mean value is 2.11 which show our average is near to favorable reply. And the std, derivation is 1.000 which show that the most of participant in the range between very satisfied and in the area of normal.




Test Application
In order to proof the hypothetical statement of the research model and for the support of the statement ANOVA test is applied to find the results and understand the study more, the result from the finding are stated below with their explanation.                   
Model Summary
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
1
.984a
.969
.968
.09279
a. Predictors: (Constant), Network Coverage, Service Quality, Service center, Internal satisfaction, Customer loyalty

The result demonstrates that the interaction the network coverage, service quality, service center. Internal satisfaction and customer loyalty.  The implication of this result is that customer satisfaction influence on customer ratings of service performance. This result could be due to the fact the mobile telecoms industry is still has to improve the customer relationship more to give the customer complete satisfaction.. Thus, there is need for routine assessment to investigate this relationship.


Table-3.6.3(a)
ANOVAb
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
32.055
5
6.411
744.642
.000a
Residual
1.025
119
.009


Total
33.080
124



a. Predictors: (Constant), Network Coverage, Service Quality, Service centre, Internal satisfaction, Customer loyalty
b. Dependent Variable: Customer satisfaction










H1: this is a relationship between CRM and customer satisfaction.
H0: this is no relationship between CRM and customer satisfaction.

As we seen in the table that the sig. value is 0.00<0.05 so, as a result shown by the table we accept the H1 and reject H0. Its show there is jointly effect of the independent variables network coverage, service quality, customer service center, internal satisfaction and customer loyalty and customer value on dependent variable customer satisfaction.


Table-3.6.3(b)
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
T
Sig.
B
Std. Error
Beta
1
(Constant)
.213
.075

2.659
.004
Network Coverage
.078
.009
.215
11.332
.000
Service Quality
.221
.006
.665
37.429
.000
Service centre
.232
.003
.340
22.932
.000
Internal satisfaction
.352
.018
.399
25.192
.000
Customer loyalty
.345
.021
.677
34.915
.000
a. Dependent Variable: Customer satisfaction






Ho: There is no influence of network coverage on customer satisfaction.
H1: There is an influence of network coverage on customer satisfaction
In the above table shows the values of the price is 0.04<0.05. It shows there is significant effect between the network coverage and customer satisfaction.

Ho: There is no influence of service quality on customer satisfaction.
H1: There is an influence of service quality on customer satisfaction
In the above table shows the values of the quality is 0.00<0.05. It shows there is significant effect between the service quality on customer satisfaction.

Ho: There is no influence of customer service center on customer satisfaction.
H1: There is an influence of customer service center on customer satisfaction
In the above table shows the values of the services is 0.00<0.05. It shows there is significant effect between the customer service center on customer satisfaction.

Ho: There is no influence of internal satisfaction on customer satisfaction.
H1: There is an influence of internal satisfaction on customer satisfaction
In the above table shows the values of the services is 0.00<0.05. It shows there is significant effect between the internal satisfactions on customer satisfaction

Ho: There is no influence of customer loyalty on customer satisfaction.
H1: There is an influence of customer loyalty on customer satisfaction.
In the above table shows the values of the brand image is 0.00<0.05. It shows there is significant effect between the customer value and CRM.


Delimitations and Limitations

Limitations:
Ø  The limitation of my study is that network coverage, service quality, internal satisfaction and customer loyalty can be study more deep to understand the customer in a better way.
Ø  Telecom has a bright future not in Pakistan but in the whole world.
Ø  The impact of the customer satisfaction is better for the telecom companies for gain customer
Delimitations:
Ø  The customer relationship management is not apply in every industry in Pakistan


No comments:

Post a Comment